Archives > Historical Features > Exhibits

UNIVERSITY HISTORY

History of Institutional Planning at the University of Pennsylvania:
Harold Edward Stassen, President (1948-1953)

by Amanda K. Klemas, C '06, University Archives Summer Research Fellow, 2004
Under the direction of Mark Frazier Lloyd, Director

 

When the Trustees met on 17 September 1948 to elect a new president, they did not choose another Pennsylvanian to follow in the footsteps of George McClelland; instead they chose Harold E. Stassen, former Governor of the state of Minnesota. Stassen came to the office after making an unsuccessful bid for the Republican nomination for President of the United States during the 1948 campaign. Although Stassen hadn't spent years in a university setting, he brought a great deal of administrative and political experience to the presidency, which enabled him to advance the University in directions that the previous presidents had not. While Provost Penniman and Presidents Gates and McClelland focused on refining educational programs at Penn, Stassen focused on fulfilling McClelland's campus expansion plan, as well as reforming intercollegiate athletics in order to conform to the requirements of the new Ivy League. Unfortunately, Stassen was also noted for his frequent absences from campus, particularly during the 1952 spring semester when he made another bid for the Republican Presidential nomination. Nevertheless, Stassen managed to make significant improvements to education at Penn, even if he did so from a distance.

Photograph of President Stassen (left) viewing campus planFirst and foremost, Stassen announced and carried out McClelland's plan for expanding the campus. At their 25 October 1948 meeting the Trustees formally adopted the Report of the Trustee's Committee on Physical Development of the University as the future plan of the University. This Committee, chaired by architect Trustee Sydney E. Martin, finalized the expansion plans developed under former president McClelland and the General Committee of the new University of Pennsylvania Fund (see McClelland). The report also finalized site locations for the new Physics Building, the new Wharton School, the new Library, the Chemistry Building, the Women's College, and new Hospital Buildings, among others. Stassen appointed Trustee Thomas S. Gates Jr. as Chairman for the Development Fund, which replaced McClelland's University of Pennsylvania Fund, but retained the same $32 million goal.

The University announced the plan in December 1948, as reported by the Pennsylvania Gazette in Expansion Plans Revealed. The article detailed Stassen's strategy to give priority to four of the building projects included in the Committee's plan: the Wharton building, the physics building, the new library, and two new additions to the hospital. One of the new hospital buildings would house an outpatient department dedicated to the memory of former president Thomas Sovereign Gates. The article also revealed that, "Locust Street would be developed through the campus as a wooded mall, closed to vehicular traffic from 36th Street to 40th." Locust Street thereby became Locust Walk, which became the backbone of an expanding campus. The Stassen administration further promised to construct all the new buildings in a traditional style by refusing to build skyscrapers and by utilizing brick and limestone. By the end of Stassen's tenure in January 1953, Dietrich Hall of the Wharton School had been completed and opened, while the Thomas Sovereign Gates Memorial Pavilion of the University Hospital stood near completion. The construction of a new physics building was delayed due to the availability of the site; however by January 1953 the University had secured both the site at 33rd and Walnut and a low bid from the Baton Construction Company. By 1 January 1953 the Development Fund's total was in excess of $9,414,000.

Stassen did not prepare a large, comprehensive planning document for the University. Instead, at the end of his tenure, he issued Four Years at Pennsylvania, a detailed account of his accomplishments in a number of important areas. Upon accepting a position as the Director of the Mutual Security Agency under the Eisenhower administration Stassen expressed his gratitude and dedication to the University. In a letter to Robert McCracken, Chairman of the Trustees, that appeared at the beginning of the report he stated,

"On resigning the Presidency may I, with all the emphasis I can command, state that my keen interest in the future success of the University and in its service to America and the world will be lifelong and that my deep affection for Pennsylvania will be enduring."

Stassen's interest in the success of the University during his presidency was evidenced by the report's discussion of:

  1. President Stassen with two students at college news conferenceThe student body

  2. Scholarships

  3. The faculty

  4. Engineering and scientific studies

  5. University finances

  6. University assets

  7. Physical facilities

  8. Associated institutions

  9. Athletics

  10. The alumni

  11. The Board of Trustees

  12. The Current Direction

While the Stassen administration made important strides in all of these areas, the most significant advances pertained to the student body, scholarships, athletics, the faculty, and of course, physical facilities. The "current direction" also revealed important plans for the future of the University.

When Stassen reflected on the evolution of the student body in Four Years at Pennsylvania, he described his efforts to revise the admissions process and to improve student relations. At the 10 December 1948 meeting of the Trustees Stassen announced that former president Dr. McClelland would conduct a special study on issues related to admissions and would recommend new policies for the following year. McClelland informed the Trustees of the completion of his survey on 8 April 1949. As a result of the survey the administration instituted limits on the enrollment of new students for all the schools. In Four Years, Stassen further explained that the University's new admissions policy brought students from all types of economic, racial, religious, geographical and national backgrounds, that all students were required to take the College Entrance Board Examinations, and that alumni actively recruited promising students for the University. Stassen successfully reorganized admissions in order to make the University more competitive and more diverse.

Stassen also concerned himself with student relations insofar as he worked to give them a stronger voice. In order to make student voices heard he established a new All-University Student Council in April 1949. At the 8 April 1949 meeting of the Trustees, at which he introduced the Council, he articulated his intentions to meet with a student group once every three weeks. In Four Years he reiterated his earnest efforts to get input from the students by describing the annual dinners he held for all of the prominent student government organizations around campus each May.

Stassen's commitment to the students also extended to financial aid. In addition to increasing funding for both senatorial and graduate scholarships Stassen created a whole new scholarship program in June 1950 that remains one of the staples of the University to this day: the Benjamin Franklin Memorial Scholarship. In Program for the Establishment of the Benjamin Franklin Memorial Scholarships: University of Pennsylvania the administration outlined a program that provided full tuition plus a $250 annual stipend to exceptional incoming students, beginning with the 1951 admissions year. The number of students awarded the scholarship would vary from year to year. Those awarded also had a moral obligation to repay the University after graduating so that future students could continue to benefit from the program.

While the Stassen administration was more than willing to extend generous scholarship opportunities to students who demonstrated tremendous academic ability, it was less than enthusiastic about compensating the University's athletes. On 8 February 1952 President Stassen and the presidents of the seven other Ivy League schools - Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth, Harvard, Princeton, and Yale -- signed the Ivy Agreement. By 14 March 1952 the Trustees had approved the agreement. An Ivy Group, which appeared in the September 1952 issue of the Gazette, described the principle points of the contract:

  1. A President's Policy Committee shall have control over decisions made by the Ivy Group

  2. Incorporation of the eight points agreed upon and announced by the schools in February 1952, which included the abolition of spring football practice, football clinics, and post-season games

  3. Subscribing members become part of the official, "Ivy Group"

  4. Substantial revision to the eligibility of student athletes

Photograph of three 1948 football players in training

The eligibility revision was perhaps the most important because it penalized athletes for poor academic performance and also adamantly denied student athletes particular types of financial assistance. Specifically, the agreement stated,

No student entering after 1 September 1953 shall be eligible for whose secondary school education was subsidized or whose post-college education is promised by an institution, by an individual or group of individuals not closely related to the family as a consideration for his attending the particular institution.

By committing to the Ivy Group Stassen made academics the most important aspect of the Penn student's experience.

Stassen was also strongly committed to the faculty. He realized that a strong faculty was a prerequisite for quality educational programs, and therefore endorsed revisions to faculty appointments, promotions, and salaries. In addition, he championed the faculty's right to freedom of expression, both at the university level and at the national level. In order to allow faculty members to contribute their ideas at the university level Stassen established the University Senate in January 1952. Trustee Dr. Odger's explained the benefits of a University Senate at the meeting of the Trustees on 21 January 1952:

With understanding leadership and a wise use, a University Senate can become, in these times of rapid and great change, an instrument for developing understanding, stability, and cohesion among the Faculty, the Administration, and the Trustees, and, therefore and instrument for achieving greater University progress.

The University Senate enabled the faculty to contribute to the policy development of the University.

Stassen was also careful to make sure that members of the faculty could freely voice their opinions outside of the University. In 1951, in an effort to quell subversive communist activity, the General Assembly of Pennsylvania proposed a Loyalty Oath Bill, which required that all state-funded university employees take an oath of support for the Constitution of the United States. In addition, all employees had to promise that they neither advocated nor belonged to any organization or group that challenged the legitimacy of the United States government. Anyone who refused to take the oath would promptly be forced to leave their position. On 30 April 1951 Stassen addressed a conference of members of the Pennsylvania State Senate and House in order to speak out against the Loyalty Oath Bill. The June 1951 Gazette recapped Stassen's remarks in Loyalty Oath Bill Opposed. In those remarks he outlined an eight-point argument:

  1. The bill would cause turmoil at the universities because many faculty members would refuse to sign the oath

  2. The bill would ultimately be found unconstitutional

  3. The bill would fail to expose communists because they would sign the oath regardless of their political views

  4. The bill would harm the standing of Pennsylvania universities among other national universities

  5. The bill was decidedly un-American because it placed all faculty members under suspicion

  6. The bill would suppress academic freedom of speech and thought

  7. The bill would cause secondary schools and undergraduate schools in Pennsylvania to advise their students against coming to Pennsylvania universities

  8. The bill would seriously diminish research grants from foundations

While all of Stassen's points didn't relate to the harm the Loyalty Oath Bill would inflict upon the faculty, his position certainly reflected his support for freedom of academic expression. He felt that the University could not fulfill its functions and duties without it. The Bill was ultimately defeated, surely in part due to President Stassen's efforts.

Stassen's contributions to the development of Penn's physical plant were also significant. In addition to the Sydney Martin campus expansion plan discussed earlier, a War Memorial Flagpole was erected during his administration. He made the completion of the new library the main priority for the years ahead.

Stassen concluded Four Years at Pennsylvania by outlining the "current direction" of the University. He left his legacy by sharing his vision for the future of the University. In the report he identified nine projects as part of Penn's current direction:

  1. Constructing a new library

  2. Improving and expanding facilities for the Women's College

  3. Reexamining the grouping of departments and administrative relationships between the College, the Wharton School, and the Scientific and Engineering School

  4. Establishing a graduate program in public-policy making

  5. Adopting an African Area Studies program in conjunction with an African House

  6. Expanding corporate support of the University

  7. Increasing the number of scholarships, particularly at the graduate level

  8. Establishing a Center for Scientific and Engineering Study and Research

  9. Continuing to defend academic freedom

These nine goals reflected Stassen's continuing devotion to Penn.

President Stassen and other administrators at a Penn luncheon

Harold Edward Stassen made his presidential mark by designing and implementing an ample number of administrative reforms and by significantly contributing to the physical development of the campus. While his time in office was relatively brief, he made the most of his four and a half years by utilizing the talents he gained from his career in politics and civil service. He successfully improved the university in the best way he knew how.

 

HISTORY of INSTITUTIONAL PLANNING at PENN:

Introduction

By Administration:

Portrait photograph of Josiah H. Penniman

Josiah H. Penniman
Provost: as chief executive officer, 1923-1930; as chief academic officer, 1930-1939

Photograph of Thomas Sovereign Gates

Thomas Sovereign Gates
President from 1930-1944

Portrait photograph of George William McClelland

George William McClelland
President from 1944-1948

Portrait photograph of Harold Edward Stassen

Harold Edward Stassen
President from 1948-1953

Portrait photograph of William Hagan DuBarry

William Hagan DuBarry
Acting President, 1950-1951, 1952, 1953

Portrait photograph of Gaylord Probasco Harnwell

Gaylord Probasco Harnwell
President from 1953-1970

Portrait photograph of Martin Meyerson

Martin Meyerson
President from 1970-1981

Photograph of Sheldon Hackney

Francis Sheldon Hackney
President from 1981-1993

Photograph of Claire Fagin

Claire Muriel Mintzer Fagin
Interim President from 1993-1994

Photograph of Judith Rodin

Judith Seitz Rodin
President from 1994-2004